diff --git a/examples/how_do_i.nom b/examples/how_do_i.nom
index 867405b..c6c7ba3 100644
--- a/examples/how_do_i.nom
+++ b/examples/how_do_i.nom
@@ -364,74 +364,3 @@ say: best of [2,-3,4,-8] where %x has score (%x * %x)
     multiplication. In addition to being more efficient, it's also more powerful and
     flexible for the language to allow you to define syntax that manipulates expressions.
 
-    For example, list comprehensions can (and are) easily defined in Nomsu as:
-
-parse [%expr for %key-var in %list] as
-    result of
-        %result <- []
-        for %key-var in %list
-            add %expr to %result
-        return %result
-
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-%double-nums <- ((2 * %num) for %num in [1,2,3,4,5])
-
-
-# Naturally, Nomsu's macros are hygienic, so even though "%result" is used as a local
-    variable in the macro, there won't be any namespace collisions or confusion if you
-    use a different variable named "%result" as any (or all) of the arguments to the macro.
-
-%result <- [1,2,3,4]
-%result <- ((2*%result) for %result in %result)
-assume: %result = [2,4,6,8]
-
-# You'll find that in a lot places where a functional programmer would think to use a
-    lambda function, what they actually want to do is some metaprogramming. If you embrace
-    the metaprogramming from the start, then you can do a lot more powerful stuff.
-
-# For example, you can define a loop that operates on recursive datastructures, but still
-    has all of the normal imperative control structures:
-
-compile [stack for %var] to
-    Lua value "stack\(%var as lua id)"
-
-parse [recurse on %sub as %super] as
-    add %sub to (stack for %super)
-
-parse [for %var in recursive %iterable %body] as
-    with {(stack for %var): [%iterable]}
-        repeat while: (length of (stack for %var)) > 0
-            %var <- (remove index 1 from (stack for %var))
-            with {%val: %expr}
-                if: %val != (nil)
-                    add %val to %result
-                %body
-            === next %var ===
-        === stop %var ===
-
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-# This action iterates over a recursive structure, but it's written imperatively and it
-    can return early without traversing the whole tree.
-action [tree %tree contains %val]
-    for %subtree in recursive %tree
-        if: %subtree = %val
-            return: yes
-        if: (type of %subtree) = "table"
-            for % in %subtree: recurse on % as %subtree
-    return: no
-
-%t <- [1,[2,[3,4,[]],5,[6]]]
-say: tree %t contains 3
-say: tree %t contains 99
-
-
-action [linked list from %list]
-    %head <- (nil)
-    for %i in (length of %list) to 1 via -1
-        %head <- {value:%list.%i, next:%head}
-    return %head
-
-for %node in recursive (linked list from [3,4,5,6,7])
-    say "NODE: \(%node.value)"
-    recurse on %node.next as %node