Updated to use 'set' syntax instead of ": yes"

core/collections.nom

@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ test:
     %visited = {}
     for %i = %x in %list:
         %visited.%i = (yes)
-    assume (%visited == {1: yes, 2: yes, 3: yes, 4: yes, 5: yes})
+    assume (%visited == {1, 2, 3, 4, 5})
     %visited = {}
     for %x in %list:
         %visited.%x = (yes)
-    assume (%visited == {1: yes, 2: yes, 3: yes, 4: yes, 5: yes})
+    assume (%visited == {1, 2, 3, 4, 5})
     assume ((%list::2 nd to last) == 4)
     assume ((%list::first) == 1)
     assume (%list::has 3)

core/control_flow.nom

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ test:
 ..all compile to:
     #   If %when_true_expr is guaranteed to be truthy, we can use Lua's idiomatic
         equivalent of a conditional expression: (cond and if_true or if_false)
-    if {Text: yes, List: yes, Dict: yes, Number: yes}.(%when_true_expr.type):
+    if {"Text", "List", "Dict", "Number"}.(%when_true_expr.type):
         return (Lua "(\(%condition as lua expr) and \(%when_true_expr as lua expr) or \(%when_false_expr as lua expr))")
     ..else:
         #   Otherwise, need to do an anonymous inline function (yuck, too bad lua